On Friday, US President Donald Trump took to his Truth Social network to condemn Apple’s practices of offshoring jobs to China to manufacture the iPhone and other products in its device lineup.
Threatening an individual tariff of 25% on all Apple products, some analysts are already putting in predictions for how the US President’s proposed rate could affect Cupertino’s supply chain, and ultimately what the company would need to charge for products like the iPhone, iMac, and more if those threats are made real.
But what does that mean for how much you might expect to pay for your next Apple upgrade in the future?
Trump threatens a 25% hike on Apple products
For starters, here is some context on what it looks like when a country tries to apply individual tariffs to companies or sectors attempting to reshore.
What Trump is suggesting, at least broadly, wouldn’t be the first time a government has applied tariffs to a single corporation.
Throughout history, the US has placed tariffs on everything from Chinese-made solar panels to Canadian lumber to protect and ensure the growth trajectory of domestic competitors.
However it is the first time a president has threatened a domestic US company with tariffs for goods it produces overseas.
“I have long ago informed Tim Cook of Apple that I expect their iPhone’s that will be sold in the United States of America will be manufactured and built in the United States, not India, or anyplace else,” Trump posted Friday morning. “If that is not the case, a Tariff of at least 25% must be paid by Apple to the U.S.”
Donald Trump, May 23, 2025
The fact that no one has ever tried to do something like this before acknowledges just how unprecedented Trump’s threats are.
Some economists might also say it is damaging to the US consumer and US stock market, stupid, short-sighted, and backward…but for now, let’s stick with “unprecedented.”
As Apple produces nearly 90% of its entire product stack from within China’s borders, this clearly presents a problem for the company.
In February of this year, Tim Cook made loose promises that Apple plans to restore over $500 billion worth of manufacturing to the US over the next four years.
This timeline feels suspiciously convenient on its own, but Trump has decided to put even more pressure on Cupertino to bring jobs back home nonetheless.
What are analysts saying about next steps?
Ahead of Trump’s latest amendment to global trade policy, Dan Ives, global lead of technology research at financial services firm Wedbush Securities, told CNN in April that bringing iPhone manufacturing back to the US wasn’t much more than “a fictional tale.”
“You build that (supply chain) in the US with a fab in West Virginia and New Jersey. They’ll be $3,500 iPhones,” he said
Ives also addressed the sheer logistical nightmare, saying it would take more than three years and $30 billion just to get 10% of the supply chain back to US shores.
Whether a tariff or the cost of reshoring is applied, the end result is a more expensive phone, laptop, iMac, or Vision Pro for you or someone in your family in the near future.
Would you even want a US-made iPhone?
If there’s one tech story that points to the potential pitfalls of Trump’s overall strategy for the US tech industry, it’s Intel.
Over the past half decade, the company has lost almost 65% of its total value, a decrease driven by AMD’s surprise chiplet attack, which threw one of America’s most stable blue chip stocks into abrupt, and up to now seemingly unending, chaos.
AMD had spent the better part of its history trailing Intel in sales, innovation, performance, and reliability. However, the company’s growing partnership with Taiwan’s chip fab specialists, Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Company, or TSMC, created a new attack point.
One where the engineering, programming, and design of a chip could be handled stateside, while TSMC would shoulder the actual chip fabrication.
A split set of duties allows companies like AMD or Nvidia to offshore many of the dirtier, more heavily regulated parts of producing chips to other regions, while hiring talent willing to work in buildings not attached to silicon manufacturing floors in the US.
Meanwhile, Intel continued to expand domestic fabrication in places like Oregon, Arizona, Nevada, and others for years before the CHIPS Act was even a thing.
Famously, the company stumbled significantly from the 10nm to 7nm production process (to the tune of billions of dollars). AMD eventually seized its opportunity to close the gap between the two chipmakers.
Everyone else is doing it, so why can’t Apple?
AMD’s model isn’t unique, of course. Nvidia, Apple, and even a modernized Intel all have to rely heavily, if not entirely, on Taiwan and TSMC to manufacture a significant portion of the chips backed by their engineering and design efforts.
Designing a product in the US and manufacturing it abroad has become a core component of the NAFTA-driven economic model since Clinton first passed the bill in the 90s. As such, it’s almost strange for Apple to be singled out the way it has been, considering how many of its direct competitors do the exact same thing.
In all likelihood, Trump, who famously said “everything’s computer," is no expert on technology trade. This lack of awareness likely allows underdogs like AMD, and even more confusing tech prospects like Nvidia, to fly under the 78-year-old’s radar in what’s become the status quo for any Silicon Valley company that wants to keep the lights on these days.
Currently, the only company seemingly capable of usurping Apple’s claim to the number one most valuable company is Nvidia, another tech giant that’s doing the exact same thing Trump claims to be against.
However, one thing Apple doesn’t have that Nvidia does is the backing of everyone around them. What’s suitable for Nvidia is good for the world (or the US). So even rivals like Meta, Tesla, and Amazon still line up next to one another to sing the hardware maker’s praises.
At the same time, they also commit to a competing AI arms race of Biblical proportions against each other.
Whether Apple’s 25% tariff is real, enforceable, or something Trump will even care about next week is likely a whim left to the courts and whatever Fox News complained about last night.
But if the company does get stuck with a new sticker price, it could face even fiercer competition from rivals like Samsung and lose shares to domestic winners like AMD, Intel, and Nvidia, which are just as complicit in offshoring US manufacturing as Apple but still somehow manage to escape Trump’s ire.
More Laptop Mag
You must confirm your public display name before commenting
Please logout and then login again, you will then be prompted to enter your display name.
