Tested: 8th Gen Core As Much as 76 Percent Faster Than Prior Gen

  • MORE

Ever since Intel unveiled its 8th Generation "Kaby Lake Refresh" CPUs in August, we've been eager to see how laptops with these chips perform in real-life. Intel says that laptops with its new processors are as much as 40 percent faster than the prior-generation "Kaby Lake" CPUs, a lofty claim that sounds too good to be true. However, in our initial tests with an Acer Swift 3 laptop, we got scores that were as much as 76 percent higher than a nearly-identical notebook with a 7th Gen Core CPU.

image 3181851506708844

When we ran Geekbench 4, a synthetic test that measures overall performance, on a Swift 3 with an 8th Gen Core i5-8250U CPU, the laptop scored an impressive 12,755, which is 5,513 points  or 76 percent higher than a Swift 3 with a Core i5-7200U CPU that we tested in July . Both the versions of the Swift 3 had 8GB of RAM and a 256GB SSD. Aside from the CPU, the only difference between the two laptops was that the 7th Gen Core model had a 14-inch screen and the 8th Gen system had a 15-inch display (both screens were 1080p).

image 3181851506711497


Intel's 8th Gen Core laptop processors in the mainstream U series improve on their predecessors by doubling the number of physical cores from two to four, increasing the maximum clockspeed and adding more on-chip cache. The Core i5-8250U CPU we tested is the direct successor to the Core i5-7200U processor, because both are the entry-level Core i5 chip in their respective lineups. The 8250U can increase its clock speed up to 3.4-GHz while the 7200U tops out at 3.1-GHz; also, the new chip has 6MB of SmartCache compared to 4MB on the older model.

Because of the larger cache and higher turbo speed, the new Swift 3 was also noticeably faster when we ran an application that doesn't take advantage of multiple cores. It took the laptop with the new chip just 3 minutes and 41 seconds to complete our spreadsheet macro test, which involves matching 20,000 names with their addresses in OpenOffice Calc, a single-threaded app. The 7th Gen-powered laptop completed the same task in 4 minutes and 2 seconds, a delta of 9 percent. While a 9 percent improvement isn't as impressive as a 76 percent gain, it is significant, particularly when you're performing even more intense tasks.

image 3181851506711678

Intel says that graphics performance on 7th and 8th Gen chips should be the same, because both processors use the same Intel HD 620 GPU. However, the laptop with 8th Gen Core creamed its predecessor, scoring 78,556, a full 43 percent higher than the 7th Gen laptop (54,619). 

image 3181851506711743

Whatever way you slice it—general performance, number crunching or graphics prowess—the 8th Gen Kaby Lake Refresh chips appears to offer a serious improvement over their 7th Gen counterparts. We look forward to running more real-world tests on matching laptops and, most importantly, to seeing how the more powerful chips affect battery life. Stay tuned.


Author Bio
Avram Piltch
Avram Piltch, LAPTOP Online Editorial Director
The official Geeks Geek, as his weekly column is titled, Avram Piltch has guided the editorial and production of Laptopmag.com since 2007. With his technical knowledge and passion for testing, Avram programmed several of LAPTOP's real-world benchmarks, including the LAPTOP Battery Test. He holds a master’s degree in English from NYU.
Avram Piltch, LAPTOP Online Editorial Director on
Add a comment
  • Eddie G. Says:

    While this might be something that those who need CPU intensive computing will thrill at. I question: Exactly how fast does a CPU need to be for the "Average User"? at what point does it stop? The average person?....can't tell if a nano-second or macro-second has passed in between instruction times, so why does it seem the industry leaders are making it seem as if current gen technology is too slow? I have computers with i5 processors from the 2012/'13 era and these machines have adequate power for daily usage and even gaming. But for someone to run out and pay nose-bleed prices for a souped up processor, unless they're trying to write code or compile kernels, it just seems like a money-grab to me. Just my opinions on the matter.

    Lenovo ThinkCenter M-83 - i5 - 32GB RAM - 1TB HDD
    Lenovo ThinkPad T-430 - i5 - 16GB RAM - 1TB SSD

  • Gadget Man Says:

    My 8th gen laptop is on way from Dell, can't wait to confirm these claims :)

  • Bobo Abo Says:

    @ABDULRAHMAN ELIASU don't worry buddy, you are not the only one who doesn't have money to buy one of these :)

  • Bob123 Says:

    The 3DMark test results are largely due to difference in RAM. Old Swift 3 had LPDDR3 and the new Swift 3 has DDR4. iGPU's are hyper sensitive to RAM transfer rates.

  • JuanSoto Says:

    I don't normally pay much attention to new CPUs (price, minimal performance gains) but this is eye-opening. Looking forward to more future testing.

    Note: one of my pet-peeves is battery-life. Hope the 8th-gen chips are gentle...

  • Matthew Says:

    Adding cores -> big boost makes sense. Clickbait

    Interested in seeing improvement from 7820HK -> 8820HK

  • Joe Bean Says:

    Was it the same SSD or maybe a faster version with the same capacity? Was it the same RAM? It is impressive.

    Regardless, it provides a good data point as to how real world laptops can evolve as a whole from one year to another.

Back to top