IE 9 Offers Most Screen Real Estate, Opens Faster Than All But Safari

  • MORE

With Internet Explorer 9 Beta, Microsoft's browser has made a giant leap forward in terms of both performance and usability. As we began to test the new browser three huge improvements became apparent. First, IE 9's toolbar area is incredibly thin and space-efficient, allowing the largest viewable area of any major Windows browser. Second, the application cold opens faster than Chrome and Firefox, with only Safari for Windows launching in less time.

Internet Explorer's Real Estate Boom

With the trend toward 1366 x 768 resolution notebook screens, users have even less vertical screen real estate than they did just a couple of years ago when 1280 x 800 was the de facto standard for mainstream notebooks. Even worse, most 10-inch netbooks have a 1024 x 600 resolution that pushes even more web content below the fold. With so few vertical pixels to work with, you need your browser to show as much Web page as possible by minimizing the size of toolbars and status bars.

Internet Explorer 9 sets the new gold standard for space efficiency, providing 21 pixels more than Google Chrome 6, the previous gold standard, when both browsers are in windowed mode. Like Chrome, IE 9 does not have a persistent status bar that takes up space at the bottom of the application, but the top area of the window uses 21 fewer pixels. With the two browsers sitting next to each other, we measured the top area of the browser at 60 pixels, as opposed to 81 pixels for Google Chrome 6. However, when we maximized the Chrome 6 window, its tabs appeared at the top of the title bar giving it an identical 60-pixel profile. We wish we had that real estate in Chrome, even if it was not maximized.

Other browsers did not come close. Firefox 4 Beta 6 has a 91-pixel top area, in addition to a 25-pixel status bar, which can be hidden. By default, Safari 5 for Windows has an 89-pixel top area, but if you turn off the bookmarks toolbar, that area shrinks to only 67 pixels, which is still 10-percent less real estate than IE 9.

So what do you get with that additional screen real estate? How about an additional line or two of text? Using IE 9 on a 1440 x 900 notebook screen, we were able to see the lines that begin with "$800 to $1,000" and "Over $,1000" beneath "Find Laptop & Notebook Reviews" on the home page. On Chrome 6 (windowed), both of those lines were below the fold. On Firefox 4 beta, with status bar enabled, the line above those ($501 to $800) was also hidden. In windowed mode, only Safari 5 came close to showing as much as IE 9.

Ironically, IE 9 actually wastes three pixels on white space below the title bar. If Microsoft would correct this problem, IE 9 would be the clear leader, even at full screen.


Chrome 6 Beta vs IE 9 (windowed)

Chrome 6 Beta vs IE 9 (Full Screen)

Firefox 4 Beta vs IE 9

Safari 5 vs IE 9

Faster App Opens for IE 9

Few things are more annoying than waiting for applications to open. Where IE 8 took more than 8 seconds to open to a blank page, IE 9 is faster than all its competitors except Safari for Windows. We cold opened each browser 3 times, rebooting in-between tests and taking the average. All tests were conducted on a Lenovo ThinkPad X301 with an 80GB SSD.

Browser Avg Open Time
IE 9 (64-bit) 2.8 seconds
IE 9 (32-bit) 2.7 seconds
Chrome 6 beta 3.0 seconds
Safari 5 1.1 seconds
Firefox 4 beta 4.7 seconds

Competitive JavaScript Rendering

IE 9 has an all-new rendering engine which allows it to put up strong numbers on the popular SunSpider JavaScript benchmark. However, we noticed that the 64-bit version of IE 9 was actually the slowest on this test, though the 32-bit version was faster than all browsers but Chrome 6 beta.

Browser SunSpider time in ms (lower is better)
IE 9 (64-bit) 2418
IE 9 (32-bit) 721
Chrome 6 beta 624.2
Safari 5 930.2
Firefox 4 Beta 971.2

So, as you can see, IE 9 offers more screen real estate than any browser in windowed mode and faster speeds than almost any other. We don't understand why the 64-bit version of IE 9 provided much worse SunSpider results but considering that users with 64-bit Windows have both versions of IE installed, you can always choose to launch the 32-bit browser instead.

The additional two lines of text you get with IE 9 make it a great choice for netbook users and for anyone else who isn't surfing on a full HD screen. Windows 7 and Vista users should definitely give Microsoft's new browser a try.

Author Bio
Avram Piltch
Avram Piltch, LAPTOP Online Editorial Director
The official Geeks Geek, as his weekly column is titled, Avram Piltch has guided the editorial and production of since 2007. With his technical knowledge and passion for testing, Avram programmed several of LAPTOP's real-world benchmarks, including the LAPTOP Battery Test. He holds a master’s degree in English from NYU.
Avram Piltch, LAPTOP Online Editorial Director on
Add a comment
  • Bill K Says:

    I got on a browser comparison trip about 2 or 3yrs back,when Firefox was pumpin all that security Hype(remember?)
    I wanted to believe that there was a better faster browser than IE6 (@the time I believe it was IE6).
    Anyhow I installed "Firefox,Opera,Chrome & Safari",however in the end, I narrowed it down to(Opera,Chrome & IE).

    Why You ask,
    Well, "Features & Ease of use" Thats what put Opera on top for me,but not without con's.
    Chrome was on top as well due to its Speed & IE6 made it too, because of its uncompromised compatibility.

    I'll explain;
    Opera had & has Features that allow saving of entire browsing sessions & Opera was making steps with Webm & HTML5 in effort to circumvent Adobies Monopoly over the internets Flash video solution.
    The CPU overhead (That I call Flash Tax),caused Me to pay very close attention to those steps.
    I figured if nothing else, Opera might cause Adobies or some other Code-Slinger to get moving on finding a new medium.

    As for Chrome it was "Fast Fast Faster";
    But the very company that made it,also made YouTube(where I spend 99% of my time)
    however while trying to watch a flash video in Chrome, I'd have to reload my YouTube page 100 times a day due to an "error ocoured" message. "Chrome is truely Incompatible with YouTube"

    Which brought Me full-circle & back to IE9.
    But, I thought of how Chrome made Me believe IE was slow & all the security issues Firefox had bombarded Me with during it's "Safest Browser on the Planet Campaign",then there was a Flash-Tax.

    Then one day, I read an "Unbiased" 3rd party Shoot-Out,that compared Firefox to IE7.
    Long story short,"FIREFOX WAS NO SAFER or FASTER THAN IE.7".

    So with Chrome Limping on the sidelines due to compatiblity isseus & Opera struggling with Webm/HTML5(Still CPU Intensive) that left IE9.

    #1 Compatibility.
    What good is speed if web pages crash 99% of the time?

    #2 Security.
    Turns out IE9 is just as Safe as Firefox.

    #3 WebM/HTML5 at this point in time has a CPU-Tax equal to Flash

    Bottom line,for me anyway, is that none of thee other browsers deliver a reason to leave & IE9 is still the best browser for windows. Now if the Code-Slinger at M$ would add the features that Opera has & the plugins/addons that Firefox has,then no one could touch IE9.

  • Jack H. Says:

    Opera sucks, gtfo.

    And why the hell wasn't this test done with Chrome Beta 9? It makes use of hardware acceleration, and opens faster than IE9 for me on my Insprion 11z (2gb ram, Pentium Dual inside).

  • Roald Says:

    Quite happy with opera here -- see .

    In Opera you can choose to move the tabbar to the left, which saves vertical space and makes the otherwise wasted horizontal space useful.

    The non-standard tweak I use on my gnome desktop is hiding the title bar for opera, see

    there must be a similar tweak for windows as well.

  • Avram Piltch Says:

    Thanks for the catch. I didn't realize that Chrome used space more efficiently when maximized. I've updated the post to reflect that they both have the same dimensions when maximized. However, IE 9 offers more in windowed mode.

  • Matthew Says:

    If you maximize the Chrome window, it has more height than IE9. When maximized, it uses the titlebar for tabs.

Back to top