2.5 star rating

Oregon Scientific ATC Chameleon Review

Pros: Shoots video in front of and behind you simultaneously; Easy controls
Cons: Large; Very bulky mounts; No mobile app; Blurry video; Doesn't take still images
The Verdict: The Oregon Scientific ATC Chameleon action cam lets you record what's ahead and what's behind you at the same time, but the video quality isn't worth it.

REVIEW

SPECIFICATIONS

Ever wish you had eyes in the back of your head? The Oregon Scientific ATC Chameleon action cam gives you just that ability. With two cameras -- one on the front, and one on the back -- you can record your comings and goings simultaneously. However, this $199 camera pack doesn't quite pack twice the fun.

Article Continued Below

Design

Oregon Scientific ATC ChameleonThis is certainly one of the funkiest action cameras we've seen. The ATC Chameleon, made of black plastic with gray accents, has an oblong shape with cameras at either end, and looks like a miniature version of a World War I tank.

While its body is black, both cameras, the on/off switch and the helmet mount are gray. Both cameras rotate 180 degrees: With the mount facing down, the front camera swivels left and right, and the rear camera rotates vertically. It's a nice touch that allows for some leeway when mounting the camera to your person.

On one side of the Chameleon is a locking plastic door that opens to reveal a microSD card slot, microUSB port, a switch to change the orientation of recording and a status button.

By necessity, the Chameleon is a bit larger than most other action cameras: At 4.5 x 1.8 x 1.6 inches, it's almost twice as big as the GoPro Hero3 (2.25 x 1.6 x 1.2 inches).

Mounting options

Oregon Scientific ATC ChameleonThe Chameleon's mounts are some of the bulkiest we've seen from an action camera. The Chameleon only comes with two mounts: one for a vented helmet and one for a tripod. The helmet mount sticks up nearly 2 inches, making this conspicuous camera all the more so.

An optional hard-shell helmet mount ($29) protrudes just as far.

Performance

Oregon Scientific ATC ChameleonWe like that the controls on the ATC Chameleon are as simple as the Contour+2: Slide the switch forward to turn the camera on and start recording, and slide it back to stop.

Each lens has a 170-degree field of view, which is pretty standard for action cams. There are no other settings, save for the switch inside the camera. This lets you change the two views from appearing side by side, or one on top of the other.

In horizontal mode, each camera in the ATC Chameleon records video at 960x720 pixels and 30 frames per second. In vertical mode, the cameras record 1280x720p video at 30 fps. Unlike most other action cams, this device doesn't take still images.

While walking through Madison Square Park, video wasn't very crisp. It was hard to make out the faces of a bunch of tourists taking photos of a squirrel eating on a park bench. Colors were fairly saturated, but well below those of the Contour+2 or the GoPro Hero3.

Audio was particularly poor. Even just walking down the street, our recorded video had a significant amount of wind noise.

Editing

Oregon Scientific ATC ChameleonThere's no iOS or Android app for the Chameleon. A desktop app for Mac and PC, though, offers some interesting editing options. You can choose to view the two videos side by side, just the front or the back, or have one video inset in the other.

Battery life

Oregon Scientific says the Chameleon should last 2 hours on a charge. In our testing, we got slightly more, 2 hours and 13 minutes, which is about average for an action camera.

Verdict

The idea of having two cameras in one action cam is a neat idea. However, Oregon Scientific's ATC Chameleon is too unwieldy, video quality isn't nearly up to par and it lacks many features other cameras in this price range offer. Having two of everything isn't always better.

Tags: Oregon Scientific ATC Chameleon, Camcorders, Digital Cameras and Camcorders, reviews

Technical Specifications
Oregon Scientific ATC Chameleon
http://us.oregonscientific.com


Size4.5 x 1.8 x 1.6 inches
Weight4.4 ounces
AUTHOR BIO
Michael A. Prospero, Reviews Editor
Michael A. Prospero, Reviews Editor
Michael A. Prospero has overseen reviews on Laptopmag.com since 2007, focusing on producing the most thorough and authoritative mobile product reviews. After receiving his Master of Science in Journalism from Columbia in 2003, Mike worked at Fast Company. Prior to that, he worked at The Times of Trenton, George and AlleyCat News.
Michael A. Prospero, Reviews Editor on
Twitter Google+
FIND A REVIEW
Laptops
All Product Types Accessories eReaders Laptops Networking Projectors Smartphones Software Storage Tablets
All Subcategories
All Subcategories All-Purpose Budget Business Desktop Replacement Gaming Multimedia Netbook Nettop Rugged Student Tablet PCs Ultraportable
Brand
Acer Alienware Apple Archos ASUS AVADirect Averatec BeagleBone BenQ CTL Corp. CyberPowerPC Dell Digital Storm eMachines Emtec Eurocom Everex Fujitsu GammaTech Gateway General Dynamics Getac Gigabyte Google Hercules HP HTC iBuyPower Intel Lenovo Maingear MSI Nokia Nvidia OCZ OLPC OQO Origin Panasonic Razer Sager Samsung Sony Sony PlayStation Sylvania Systemax TabletKiosk Toshiba Verizon Viewsonic Viliv Vizio VooDoo Workhorse PC ZT Systems
Minimum Rating
Any Rating Editor's Choice 4.5 Stars 4.0 Stars 3.5 Stars 3.0 Stars
Screen Size
10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 20 21 4 5 6 7 8 9
Resolution
1024x576 1024x600 1024x768 1136 x 768 1200X800 1280 x 720 1280x1024 1280x768 1280x800 1366x678 1366x768 1440x1050 1440x900 1600x768 1600x900 1680x1050 1680x945 1792 x 768 1900x1080 1920x1080 1920x1200 2560 x 1440 2560 x 1600 2560 x 1700 2880 x 1620 2880 x 1880 3200 x 1800 3840 x 2160 800x400 800x480
Weight Range
10.1 - 12.0 pounds 12.1 - 14.0 pounds 14.1 - 16.0 pounds 2 lbs 2 pounds and under 2+ lbs 2.1 - 4.0 pounds 4.1 - 6.0 pounds 6.1 - 8.0 pounds 8.1 - 10.0 pounds Over 16 pounds Under 2 pounds
more options
SUBSCRIBE